Comments on: Should Breaking Dawn Be Done In Two Films

By: Amanda

Amanda — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:21:36 +0000

I think it should be made into two becasue it would drag out the whole series longer!!! I dont want there to be one more movie then its over!! And also a lot does happen in Breaking Down that should be in two parts

By: Michelle

Michelle — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:05:52 +0000

This poster was not made by nikibella it was made by a woman named Julia on http://tinderbox210.livejournal.com this nikinella person stole this image from Julia just so you know.

By: Sharon Mills

Sharon Mills — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:33:56 +0000

Breaking Dawn needs to be two movies. There is so much in the book that making one movie would mean that so much has to be left out and I don’t want anything left out at all.

By: Lena

Lena — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:57:33 +0000

Uh, hell yeah; Breaking Dawn should be in two films. There’s too much going on for it not to be broken in two. ATTENTION: BREAKING NEWS –
“BREAKING DAWN” GETS ‘BROKEN’ IN TWO.

By: Sylvia

Sylvia — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:06:36 +0000

2 films are better
the more films there are the more better it is and have you guyz read Midnight Sun by Stephanie Meyer
its from the twilight saga : book 5 its not yet published better yet done but you can find it online and read 12 chapters of it .

By: icey

icey — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:37:15 +0000

@Doremon, i totally agree with you! Thank God we’re on the same wavelength! there are a lot of missing “important scenes” in that new moon movie and it really dissappointed me! and the way the Cullens looked! oh my! NR as rosalie is totally disturbing and the rosalie in New moon disturbed me more!!! but in fairness to them the volturi looked really good and jacob too.. it’s just sad that Edward really looked like a total mess even with the scenes he should have looked good.. haaays! anyways, we’ll just have to wait for eclipse now and see if the director nailed it… i hope so….

By: Doremon

Doremon — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:37:37 +0000

@icey: you’re not the only one who miss Bella and Edward. I also think CH is the only one who could bring Edward and Bella alive from the Book, who could make Rob and Kristen’s chemistry so strong that people are getting obsessed with this stuff. New Moon was so much expected and comercial suceed because of Twilight. The Twilight saga has been ruiled by those male director, who couldn’t understand what’re women love to see. Eclipse is going to have more actions and maybe become a guys movie. I just wait to see BD so that I could see Bella and Edward’s love passion again. 2 movies is great, so they have time to bring all the parts we love to the movies. In NEW MOON I miss so much the EB’s reunion dialogue in her room. They made such a big mistake cutting that part so short. Melisa Rosenberg is a poor writer. I don’t want her to make BD again, she ruined everythings we love from these books of SM.

By: icey

icey — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:02:16 +0000

thank God i read in here that CH did a great job in twilight than CW, i totally thought that i am the only one who noticed that

its doesnt matter to me if BD will be 1 or 2 movies.. i just want to see it! and i hope that SM will write another book following BD… i really miss edward and bella

By: lila999

lila999 — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:54:33 +0000

i don´t give a s—t if the movie takes 5 hours!!!
i will love to see it!!!!!!!!!

By: Islesme

Islesme — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:49:10 +0000

I totally agree with you Addy, I think CH should came back for BD, she’ll be able to tell the story in just one film, even if it is a 2hr and 1/2 film.

By: Addy

Addy — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:44:50 +0000

A lot had been said about CH lately but for me, she’s the only director who could capture the true essence of love between E/B. The success of Twilight is a testament to that.(No offence to CW or any other director). First part of BD is about a girl’s engagement, marriage, honeymoon, giving birth & motherhood. These are natural stages in a woman’s life/domain w/o being sexist. As to whether one or two films, I believe Lorna is in a better position to give an insight to this as she can do screenplays.

By: Marianna

Marianna — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:15:50 +0000

Two films or a 3-4 hours film,hehe!

By: robstenforever

robstenforever — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:32:15 +0000

i want it in two films because some details might be left out and i would like a detailed movie.

By: Rosie

Rosie — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:51:39 +0000

I totally agree w/ saphemyst.
Rosenberg did an awful job for new moon,so did CW.
i’d prefer CH for direct BD.
And it should be separated into 2 films. One prevamp and postvamp.

By: kenya

kenya — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:20:13 +0000

i mean i can’t get enough of the twilight saga ever, im totally in love with it, but other movies are longer then 2 hours possibly 3 yeah 3
so can’t breaking dawn be more then 2 and a half hours? but it would be better in one film.

By: lila999

lila999 — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:39:34 +0000

i would like it in 2 but that would take a long time!!!!

By: Ana Lisbeth

Ana Lisbeth — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:05:31 +0000

I would rather to be two films….bcuz i CANT get enough of the Twilifht Saga…besides…Breaking Dawn, it’s like my second favorite book ( Twilight/Midnite Sun is number one) and I would really enjoy if they could bring to the movie(s) as much as possible…..:D

By: Tahira

Tahira — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:25:45 +0000

I would love to have it in 2 films because I don’t want it to end. But if they do that there shouldnt be very much time beteren part 1 and 2 because i wont be Able to wait Any more !!!!!!!

By: twilightrulez21

twilightrulez21 — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:00:29 +0000

if they make it 2 films then in theaters they HAVE to show it back to back

By: kiwigirl

kiwigirl — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:56:45 +0000

There should be 2 movies made as there is so much going on in Breaking Dawn. But to do that if they stick closely to the books storyline I feel that it may require a R-rating which would keep a majority of fans unable to go see it at the movies, and I’m sure the powers at Summit wouldn’t allow that as teens are where the moneys at. All I can say is either way as long as they make it, as Twilight wouldn’t be complete if they don’t…Someone make a decision…ASAP!!!!

By: kiwigirl

kiwigirl — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:54:31 +0000

There should be 2 movies made as there is so much going on in Breaking Dawn. But to do that if they stick closely to the books storyline I feel that it may require a R-rating which would keep a majority of fans unable to go see it at the movies, and I’m sure the powers at Summit wouldn’t allow that as teens are where the moneys at. All I can say is either way as long as the make it, as Twilight wouldn’t be complete if they don’t…Someone make a decision…ASAP!!!!

By: Lena

Lena — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:36:29 +0000

Uh, yeah.
There’s too much going on for it to only be 2hrs; you got E/B’s honeymoon, her finding out she’s preggers, Jacob interfering, STILL, the transformation, the baby, the volturi, their second honeymoon, ect. I know they won’t put EVERYTHING in there but everything that I put down is essential/needed in the movie or else it won’t make sense.

By: Danni

Danni — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:57:03 +0000

I’d rather it were made in one movie.
I mean to make it two, they’d have to split it at one point, and where would that be? What would be the point in seperating it? How would it be seperated?

Wedding/honeymoon/pregnancy…Film 1
Vampire Bella/Fight…Film 2
Then we’d have to wait for the part 1, and then part 2 to come out.

By: lola

lola — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:20:43 +0000

well ,i really would like it to be two , only cause i dont want it to end.. lol …
but if finally its two movies they have to be close one from another or ill die waiting …

By: Julie

Julie — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:42:03 +0000

i personaly think there should be just one film since the book wasn’t really long. Can’t wait though!!